{"id":749,"date":"2026-07-23T07:55:34","date_gmt":"2026-07-23T07:55:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/?p=749"},"modified":"2026-07-23T11:26:06","modified_gmt":"2026-07-23T11:26:06","slug":"62-3-2-2-2-2-6-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/?p=749","title":{"rendered":"Small Intestinal Tumours: Histopathological Findings in Enterectomy Specimens. A Ten-Year Experience from a Tertiary Surgical Center in Greece and Review of the Literature"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Original Article<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Hell J Surg. 2025 Apr-Jun;95(5):55\u201367<br \/>\n<span dir=\"ltr\" role=\"presentation\">doi: 10.59869\/25062<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Panagiotis Theodoropoulos<sup>1<\/sup>, Georgios Floros<sup>1<\/sup>, Georgios Giannos<sup>1<\/sup>, Stavroula Papaeleftheriou<sup>1<\/sup>, Vasiliki Tseliou<sup>1<\/sup>, Konstantinos Bikas<sup>1<\/sup>, Dimitrios Matsagkos<sup>1<\/sup>, Athina Chrysikopoulou<sup>1<\/sup>, Ioannis Tsiampas<sup>1<\/sup>, Teresa Bidetti<sup>1<\/sup>, Aikaterini Starka<sup>1<\/sup>, Stavroula Katsimente<sup>1<\/sup>, Marietta Lavrentaki<sup>1<\/sup>, Georgios Taibiris<sup>1<\/sup>, Aggeliki Koltsida<sup>1<\/sup>, Nestoras Georgakakos<sup>1<\/sup>, Nikolaos Chatziathanasiou<sup>1<\/sup>, Achilleas Koulaksidis<sup>1<\/sup>, Evangelos Velaoras<sup>1<\/sup>, Panagiotis Psychas<sup>1<\/sup>, Filalithis Mamakis<sup>1<\/sup>, Konstantina Sitouni<sup>1<\/sup>, Nikolaos Kochilas<sup>1<\/sup>, Konstantinos Sfakianakis<sup>1<\/sup>, Dimitrios Chasiotis<sup>1<\/sup>, Panagiotis Prigkouris<sup>1<\/sup>, Georgios Papadopoulos<sup>1<\/sup>, Charalambos Kokkinos<sup>1<\/sup>, Dimitrios Manganas<sup>1<\/sup>, Konstantinos Toutouzas<sup>5<\/sup>, Christos Kontovounisios<sup>1,2,3,4<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><sup>1<\/sup>2<sup>nd<\/sup> Surgical Department Evaggelismos Athens General Hospital, Athens, Greece<br \/>\n<sup>2<\/sup>Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK<br \/>\n<sup>3<\/sup>Department of General Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK<br \/>\n<sup>4<\/sup>Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK<br \/>\n<sup>5<\/sup>First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, \u201cHippokration\u201d General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-130\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/PDF-icon.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"48\" height=\"48\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>Correspondence:\u00a0 <\/em>Theodoropoulos Panagiotis, MD, MSc, 2nd Surgical Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, 45-47 Ipsilantou St. 106 76 Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30 6938 28 97 34, e-mail: <a href=\"mailto:pantheo335@gmail.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">pantheo335@gmail.com<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong> Abstract<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Introduction: <\/strong>Small intestine tumours represent ~3% of gastrointestinal neoplasms and 0.6% of all cancers, despite the extensive intestinal surface. Diagnosis is often delayed (up to two years for malignant tumours) due to non-specific symptoms, necessitating heightened clinical awareness and improved diagnostics.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Purpose: <\/strong>This study investigated the prevalence, characteristics, and clinical presentation of small intestine tumours in patients undergoing enterectomy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Methodology: <\/strong>A retrospective study was conducted at the Surgical Department of a tertiary center in Athens, including patients who underwent primarily emergency enterectomy during the period 2014\u20132024. All relevant medical records and pathology reports were evaluated, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26. A literature review (2000\u20132025) was also conducted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Results: <\/strong>Among the participants (N=62), 37.1% underwent enterectomy for obstruction and 29% for incidental tumor detection. The mean resection length and mean tumour size were 30.1 and 5.7 cm, respectively. Malignancy was detected in 79% of cases, with lymph node metastases in 25% and pT4 staging in 42.9%. Histological types included gastrointestinal stromal tumours (21%), metastatic tumours (17.7%), neuroendocrine tumours (14.5%), lymphomas (9.7%), and adenocarcinomas (9.7%). R0 resection was achieved in 88.1% of cases. Procedures were mostly emergency-based in patients with advanced disease at diagnosis.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Conclusions: <\/strong>Small intestine tumours are rare but clinically significant, often presenting late. Our findings align with the current literature, confirming the predominance of malignancy and emergency presentations. Geographic and histological variations may reflect genetic and environmental influences. Early diagnosis and tailored surgical management could improve outcomes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><strong>Key Words:<\/strong><\/em> Small intestine, neoplasm, tumour, enterectomy, histopathology<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"SubmissionAcceptance\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Submission: 07.08.2025, Acceptance: 20.02.2026<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Small bowel neoplasms are thought to account for as few as 4 to 13 hospital admissions per 100,000 patients [1]. They represent approximately 0.6% of all new cancer cases and 3% of all gastrointestinal tumours in the United States [2], with a rising incidence, particularly for neuroendocrine tumours. Although the small intestine comprises over 90% of the gastrointestinal surface [3], diagnosing small bowel tumours (SBTs) is challenging mainly due to their non-specific symptoms.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While most patients &#8211; especially in cases of malignancy- are asymptomatic, SBTs often present with intermittent abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, anaemia, and weight loss [4]. Complications may include gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, perforation, and jaundice, with larger tumours more likely to cause obstructive symptoms. Due to the small bowel\u2019s ability to compensate, even advanced lesions may present subtly, as incomplete ileus involving two-thirds of the lumen [5].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Histological types also vary according to tumour location: adenocarcinomas are more frequently found in the duodenum and jejunum, whereas neuroendocrine tumours are predominantly located in the ileum [3].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding the molecular pathogenesis of SBTs, data remain scarce. However, KRAS mutations\u2014commonly observed in colorectal cancer\u2014are frequently detected in small bowel adenocarcinomas [6,7]. Allelic losses involving tumour suppressor genes have been reported, particularly at 5q (APC gene), 17q (p53), and 18q (DCC and SMAD4) chromosomal sites [8]. Approximately 15% of small bowel adenocarcinomas are also microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers, typically due to inactivation of DNA mismatch repair genes [9]. MSI-H status is often seen in coeliac disease-associated tumours, resulting from abnormal methylation of CpG \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(cytosine-guanine) islands [10]. Furthermore, gene expression studies suggest that common mediators of oncogenic pathways such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) correlate with a significant proportion of small intestinal tumours [11].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Although literature reports regarding small bowel neoplasms are expanding, published data on broader, postoperative cohorts from Greece remain limited. The aim of this study was to present a ten-year retrospective case series of patients who underwent enterectomy for small bowel tumours at a tertiary university hospital and to review current literature on their epidemiology, pathology, and clinical behaviour. In addition, the study aimed to evaluate the stage of the tumour at the time of diagnosis.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Materials and Methods<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Study Design and Setting<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This is a single-centre, retrospective, observational study conducted at the Surgical Department of a tertiary university hospital in Athens, Greece. The study covered a ten-year period, from January 2014 to August 2024, and aimed to investigate the prevalence, histopathological characteristics, and clinical features of patients undergoing enterectomy for small bowel tumours. In addition, a systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in order to assess our findings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of the Study<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patients of any gender or age who underwent segmental small bowel resection (enterectomy) for a histologically confirmed primary or metastatic neoplastic lesion of the small intestine during the study period were included. Only complete enterectomies either performed electively or, more commonly, on an emergency basis were included in our analysis.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patients who underwent small bowel resection combined with resection of another organ for a different primary pathology or patients whose enterectomy did not involve a tumour or tumourous lesion of the small intestine, including operations for ischaemic or inflammatory bowel conditions were excluded from the cohort. The latter included cases such as ischaemic necrosis, Crohn\u2019s disease, non-neoplastic perforation, adhesions, mesh erosion, or local extension of extraintestinal malignancies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Patient Sample and Data Collection<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During the study period, a total of 192 enterectomies were performed by twelve different general surgeons at the Surgical Department. Of these, 130 cases were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria, resulting in a final sample of 62 patients with histologically confirmed small bowel tumours or tumourous lesions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A structured review of medical records, operative reports, and pathology files was conducted to extract the following variables:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Patient demographics (age, gender)<\/li>\n<li>Clinical presentation and indication for surgery (e.g., obstruction, bleeding, incidental discovery)<\/li>\n<li>Type and length of bowel resection<\/li>\n<li>Tumour size (measured macroscopically)<\/li>\n<li>Histopathological diagnosis and classification<\/li>\n<li>Resection margin status (R0: negative margins, R1: microscopically positive margins)<\/li>\n<li>Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging and histological grade of differentiation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All histological data were obtained from official pathology reports issued by the hospital\u2019s Department of Pathology. Tumours were classified based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and tumour staging was assigned according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system, where applicable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, although pathology reports were generally comprehensive, variability in documentation was observed across cases, particularly in older reports or those prepared during emergency interventions. Missing data were treated accordingly, and all available information was included in the statistical analysis.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Histopathological Classification<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Histological classification was performed using standard WHO diagnostic categories for small bowel neoplasms, including adenocarcinomas, neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), lymphomas, and metastatic lesions from extraintestinal primary tumours. SBTs from all small bowel parts were included along with duodenal, ampullary and periampullary lesions.In addition, when immunohistochemical or molecular testing (e.g., CD117, DOG1 for GISTs; chromogranin, synaptophysin for NETs) was available, these findings were used to support the final diagnosis.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Statistical Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 26. Quantitative variables (e.g., age, tumour size, length of resection) were summarised using the mean, standard deviation (SD), range, minimum and maximum values, and categorical variables (e.g., gender, tumour type, stage, resection margin status) were expressed as absolute frequencies and percentages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the relatively small sample size, no inferential statistical tests were performed to compare subgroups or assess predictors. Instead, the statistical analysis focused on descriptive epidemiology and the presentation of trends observed within the cohort.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to incomplete data in some pathology reports\u2014particularly regarding tumour grade, TN stage, resected bowel length, mass size, and resection margins\u2014analyses were performed using a complete-case approach. Therefore, missing values were clearly identified and the corresponding cases were excluded from specific calculations where the relevant information was unavailable. Absolute counts and percentages for the data regarding these parameters are detailed in the tables included in the Supplementary Index (<a href=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-s1-5.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tables S1-S5<\/a>). In addition, all study findings were compared to the current literature following a systematic review of relevant sources.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Ethics Statement<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the study hospital and all study procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study also adhered to national and institutional standards for biomedical research involving human subjects.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Data were collected anonymously, and recorded using a structured Excel form. Personal data were processed in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016\/679 of the European Union. Access to medical records and pathology reports was restricted to authorised personnel involved in the study, and data was used exclusively for research purposes.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>R<\/strong><strong>esults<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Demographics<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The study included 62 patients who underwent enterectomy for small bowel tumours, with a predominance of males (58.1%). Patient ages ranged from 25 to 90 years, with the majority over 50 years old. The mean age was approximately 63 years (SD \u00b1 16.68), reflecting a predominantly older adult population.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Clinical Presentation and Indications for Surgery<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Clinical indications for enterectomy varied. The predominant symptom was obstructive ileus, accounting for 37.1% of cases. Incidental detection of an intra-abdominal mass, either during imaging\/operation for other reasons or imaging as follow-up to previously known malignancy, was the second most frequent indication, observed in 29% of patients. Other clinical presentations included small bowel perforation (8.1%), gastrointestinal bleeding presenting as mesenteric haemorrhage or anaemia (4.8%), and abdominal pain (4.8%). Less frequent indications included incidental finding of small bowel lesions within a hernia sac (3.2%) and jaundice due to obstruction of Vater\u2019s ampulla (1.6%). A notable proportion (11.3%) underwent surgery for miscellaneous reasons, such as fistula formation or the presence of a tumour adjacent to other intra-abdominal pathology (<a href=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-t1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Table 1<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tumour Characteristics: Size, Location, and Histopathology<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The length of the small bowel resected varied significantly, reflecting differences in surgical indication and intraoperative findings, with a mean resection length of 30.1 cm. Tumour size ranged from 0.4 cm to 18.5 cm, with an average diameter of 5.7 cm. However, due to incomplete data in several histopathology reports regarding tumour size or the length of the resected intestine, these measurements should be interpreted cautiously.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The location of the excised tumour in patients who underwent enterectomy could not be evaluated also due to several incomplete histopathology reports, which in 61.3% of cases (38\/62) labelled the tumour origin as \u201cundefined part of the small bowel\u201d. Among the adequately documented SBT cases, 8% (5\/62) were located in the duodenum, 9.7% (6\/62) in the ileum and 11.3% (7\/62) in the distal jejunum. Finally, six of the excised tumours corresponded to obtained from Whipple procedures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Histopathological analysis revealed that 79% of the small bowel lesions were malignant, with a predominance of advanced disease. Specifically, 42.9% of the detected small bowel malignancies were classified as pT4, 21.4% as pT3, 17.9% as pT2 and 10.7% as pT1 (Figure 1). In 25% of all malignant cases, lymph node metastases (N1 or N2) were detected, whereas in 46.4% of cases, lymph node status was unknown, limiting the assessment of nodal involvement. Tumour differentiation varied, with 38.5% of tumours classified as well-differentiated (Grade 1), 34.6% moderately differentiated (Grade 2), and 26.9% poorly differentiated (Grade 3).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-831\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"865\" height=\"539\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f1.jpg 1324w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f1-300x187.jpg 300w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f1-1024x638.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f1-768x479.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 865px) 100vw, 865px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"Lezanda\" style=\"text-align: justify;\" align=\"center\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\"><strong>FIGURE 1.<\/strong> Staging by T stage, small bowel tumours (Data from our institution).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Resection margins were negative (R0) in 88.1% of patients, indicating complete tumour excision in the majority of cases, while 11.9% had microscopically positive margins (R1).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Detailed analysis of the histological findings revealed that gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) were the most common tumour type, comprising 21% of cases (N=13\/62). In 11 patients with GISTs, the TNM staging was reported as T2Nx in one case, T2N0 in two cases, T3Nx in two cases, T3N0 in one case, T4Nx in four cases and T1Nx in one more case. The grading of the GISTs was only reported in three cases (one as G1 and two as G3). Metastatic tumours accounted for 17.7% (11\/62) of patients who underwent enterectomy for small bowel tumours in the study period, reflecting secondary involvement of the small bowel from other primary sites (e.g., gastric GIST= 1, gastric neoplasms=2, gastric adenocarcinoma=1, large-bowel adenocarcinomas=4, pancreatic adenocarcinomas=1, leiomyosarcoma=1, lung adenocarcinoma=1) (<a href=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-suppl6.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Supplementary Table S6<\/a>). Regarding NETs, they represented 14.5% of the total cohort (N=9\/62), while lymphomas and adenocarcinomas each accounted for 9.7% of the tumours. Out of nine NETs, TNM staging was available in seven of them; one case was T1Nx, two were T2N1, one was T3N0, one was T4N1, one was T4N0 and one more case was T4N1M1. In addition, three NETs were reported as G1, five as G2 and one as G3. Regarding adenocarcinomas (N=6\/62), two patients were staged as G3, two as G2 and two as G1. Only one adenocarcinoma case missed the TNM classification in our population. The rest adenocarcinoma cases (N=5\/6) included one participant with T4N1M1, two with T4N0, and other two with T4N2. Benign neoplasms including lipomas, adenomas, desmoid tumours, Meckel\u2019s diverticulum and small bowel diverticula were identified in 21% of the participants. In addition, several rare tumour types were observed: one case of duodenal paraganglioma, two cases of small bowel sarcoma, one case of primary small bowel melanoma, and one case of PJS with an associated hamartomatous polyp (Figure 2).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-832\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"858\" height=\"553\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f2.jpg 1324w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f2-300x193.jpg 300w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f2-1024x660.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f2-768x495.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 858px) 100vw, 858px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>FIGURE 2.<\/strong> Histological distribution of small bowel tumours. Pathology reports from our institution (numbers on the pie chart representing: frequency; percentage).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Operative Data and Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The majority of enterectomies were performed as emergency procedures due to obstruction or perforation, indicative of advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. Data on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term follow-up evaluations of the participants were limited, and therefore not included in this analysis.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>D<\/strong><strong>iscussion and Comparison with Literature<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Early diagnosis of SBTs remains challenging due to non-specific symptoms, which do not easily raise high clinical suspicion. Therefore, the majority of SBTs remain clinically silent for long periods, being misdiagnosed and untreated until emergency surgical intervention is required. The median time between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis is estimated at around three years for benign and up to two years for malignant tumours, contributing to poorer prognosis [3]. This study provides valuable insight into the clinical and histopathological characteristics of SBTs over a ten-year period in a single tertiary centre in Greece. The findings of our retrospective study, along with a narrative review, are consistent with current literature, highlighting both consistencies and divergences regarding the epidemiology, histopathology and clinical presentation of SBTs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A narrative review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in order to assess the findings of our study. A total of 56 studies [3,7,12,13,14-65] published between January 2000 and January 2025 were included, identified through searches on PubMed and ScienceDirect using the terms (\u201cSmall intestine tumours\u201d OR \u201csmall intestine neoplasms\u201d). Only studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria (e.g., more than 20 patients, English language, full-text availability, human subjects, and reporting on histological subtype, incidence, and surgical findings) were considered (Figure 3). Most included studies were retrospective cohorts from North America, Europe, and Asia, with additional contributions from South America and Africa (Figure 4). However, significant heterogeneity in study design limited the feasibility of a reliable meta-analysis, allowing primarily descriptive comparisons among patients with SBTs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-833\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"721\" height=\"886\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f3.jpg 1400w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f3-244x300.jpg 244w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f3-833x1024.jpg 833w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f3-768x944.jpg 768w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f3-1250x1536.jpg 1250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 721px) 100vw, 721px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>FIGURE 3.<\/strong> Flow chart of literature search.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-834\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f4.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"824\" height=\"465\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f4.jpg 1504w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f4-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f4-1024x578.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f4-768x434.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 824px) 100vw, 824px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>FIGURE 4.<\/strong> Distribution of studies by continent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Our demographic findings align partially with international data, though the clinical presentation differs markedly. In particular, the mean age of patients in our cohort was approximately 63 years, slightly younger than the mean age reported in Western studies (approximately 66 years) [35], but consistent with the known epidemiology indicating that SBTs typically arise after the fifth decade of life. A male predominance (58.1%) was observed in our cohort, in line with global trends (53-62% male patients) [2].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding clinical presentation of SBTs, our study indicated obstructive ileus as the most frequent clinical indication for surgical intervention (37.1%), followed by the incidental detection of intra-abdominal masses (29%). In contrast, according to literature [1,19] gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in 30% to 50% of cases in most Western and Asian series, whereas in our cohort it accounted for only 4.8% (Figure 5). For example, Taiwanese studies report gastrointestinal bleeding in up to 39.2% of patients [19]. However, these divergences could be biased due to the nature of our study population, which mainly consisted of patients requiring urgent surgical intervention due to obstruction, rather than patients with SBTs. In the latter, diagnostic workup often follows subtle or non-specific symptoms such as gastrointestinal bleeding, prior to surgery.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-835\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f5.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"954\" height=\"550\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f5.jpg 1508w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f5-300x173.jpg 300w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f5-1024x590.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f5-768x443.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 954px) 100vw, 954px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>FIGURE 5.<\/strong> Bar chart showing the prevalence of clinical manifestations of small bowel tumours based on literature data.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The histological profile of our cases also diverges notably in comparison to other geographic regions. While NETs and adenocarcinomas are predominant in Western cohorts [16], our data showed a higher incidence of GISTs (21%) and metastatic lesions (17.7%). In our study, NETs, adenocarcinomas, and lymphomas accounted for only 14.5%, 9.7% and 9.7% of the participants, respectively. However, in Japan and parts of Asia, lymphomas and GISTs are more prevalent (16,66, Figure 6). The high frequency of GISTs in our findings could reflect both environmental and genetic factors, as well as the geographic positioning of Greece between Western Europe and Asia. Furthermore, the higher incidence of metastatic lesions may reflect secondary involvement of the small bowel by other primary tumours, indicative of patients with advanced histopathological stage such as the majority of our patients.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-836\" src=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"936\" height=\"656\" srcset=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f6.jpg 1508w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f6-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f6-1024x718.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/hjs.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hjs-95-55-f6-768x538.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 936px) 100vw, 936px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>FIGURE 6.<\/strong> A stacked bar chart illustrating the regional distribution of small bowel tumour subtypes across the USA, Asia, and Europe.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the literature review, the frequency of SBTs decreases from proximal to distal segments\u2014affecting mostly the duodenum, the jejunum, and least often the ileum [3]. The histological types also vary based on the tumour location with adenocarcinomas representing the predominant malignancies in the duodenum and jejunum, whereas neuroendocrine tumours occur most commonly in the ileum [3]. However, anatomical tumour location could not be consistently assessed in our study due to incomplete histopathology data recording. In addition, based on the available reports in our study centre, ileum and distal jejunum appeared to be frequently involved in patients who underwent enterectomy, in alignment with obstruction-related manifestations. However, this is a hypothesis-generating finding that contrasts with global data, which indicate that most SBTs occur in the duodenum (55%), followed by the jejunum (30%) and ileum (15%) [67].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Concerning the tumour size, the mean value for patients who underwent enterectomy for SBTs in our study centre was 5.7 cm, in line with the literature [4,14,20,30,39,65,66] indicating that SBTs are often large at the time of diagnosis due to diagnostic delays. The average length of bowel resected in our study population was 30.1 cm; however, we did not find relevant data on this parameter in our review.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Survival outcomes were not assessed in our cohort due to lack of long-term follow-up assessments. Nonetheless, literature data indicate that prognosis is closely linked to histological subtype and tumour stage, parameters which were not accurately documented in all our cases. NETs are generally associated with a more favorable prognosis, with median survival exceeding 8 years [68], whereas adenocarcinomas and sarcomas are linked to significantly worse outcomes. According to large registry data, five-year survival rates can reach 84% in cases of localised disease, but decline to 42% in metastatic cases [69]. Given that nearly half of our tumours (42.9%) were staged as pT4 and a significant proportion had nodal involvement (25%) or unknown status (46.4%), overall survival outcomes are likely to be poorer in this cohort. However, the high R0 resection rate (88.1%) even in emergency procedures such as those in our study, may partially mitigate this, enhancing an improved overall outcome in case of malignancy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Finally, several risk factors are associated with small bowel malignancies. Chronic inflammatory conditions including Crohn\u2019s disease and celiac disease, dietary habits (e.g., high intake of alcohol, red meat, smoked or processed foods), tobacco use, HIV infection, and genetic syndromes including Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS), and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) are the most common [3,67]. However, due to limited access to our patients\u2019 medical reports, a review of potential risk factors for SBTs was not feasible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Strengths and limitations<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The strengths of this study include detailed clinical presentations and histological types on SBTs over a ten-year period at one of the largest hospitals in our country, as well as an extensive literature review of 56 studies published over the past 25 years. To our knowledge, this is the first observational study to document the histopathological subtypes and clinical presentation of SBTs in a Greek patient population. The real-world nature of our data, particularly regarding emergency presentations, offers a valuable perspective on the management of SBTs in the Greek population.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, this is a retrospective, single-centre study involving patients who underwent enterectomy primarily due to emergency symptoms and were subsequently found to have a SBT, which limits the generalizability of our findings to all SBTs cases. The predominance of emergency procedures in our cases may have biased the cohort towards more aggressive and advanced-stage tumours, while similar tumours presenting with vague symptoms and not requiring surgical management may have been missed. Specifically, slow-growing SBTs presenting with non-typical symptoms (e.g., unexplained abdominal pain, anaemia, subtle gastrointestinal haemorrhage, weight loss) may also have been detected in elective or outpatient settings such as gastroenterology departments, although the small intestine is not always accessible by conventional endoscopic techniques. This delay in diagnosis frequently results in the need for emergency surgical management due to acute obstruction or perforation such as in our cohort.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Furthermore, the absence of documented data on tumour size, nodal status, and precise anatomical location in some pathology reports impairs the interpretation of certain findings. We surely acknowledge this as a limitation of our study, but also as an opportunity to improve our documentation practices as medical providers, when assessing biopsy specimens. Finally, regarding the long-term outcomes of SBTs, conclusions could not be drawn, as no follow-up evaluations or survival data were available for the participants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Future directions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Our findings on SBTs may provide a basis for future multicentre, prospective research including patients with a broader spectrum of clinical manifestations.\u00a0 In addition, establishing national or regional tumour registries standardised for tumour details (e.g., dimensions, location, histopathology), would enhance data completeness and quality, thereby optimizing the generalizability of the results. Moreover, the integration of molecular and genomic profiling may strengthen our understanding of tumour biology and enable personalised treatment approaches on SBTs. Finally, future research should focus on recurrence, survival rates, and quality of life following surgery through long-term studies, in order to refine clinical management and improve prognostic counselling. In light of this, integrating advanced diagnostic methods such as capsule endoscopy, CT enterography, or magnetic resonance enterography into standard clinical practice for patients with unexplained abdominal symptoms could support the timely diagnosis of STBs at earlier tumour stages, where curative resection is more likely and prognostic outcomes more favourable.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>C<\/strong><strong>onclusion<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SBTs are rare tumours with diverse histopathological profiles which significantly influence their clinical presentation and surgical management. Our retrospective, single-centre study highlights notable variations regarding the clinical presentation and histopathology of SBTs, particularly the higher incidence of emergency presentations and advanced-stage tumours compared to international literature. These findings may serve as a pilot for future quality improvement initiatives focused on heightened clinical suspicion in patients with non-typical symptoms, tailored diagnostic strategies and timely surgical intervention in order to improve outcomes in patients with SBTs. In view of this, further large-scale, prospective, multicentre studies in broader cohorts are needed to enhance epidemiological knowledge, refine treatment strategies, and improve prognosis in patients with SBTs.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Conflict of Interest<\/strong><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and\/or publication of this article.<\/em><\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>R<\/strong><strong>eferences<\/strong><\/h5>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gourtsoyianni S, Papanikolaou N. Small bowel benign neoplasms and polyposis. In: Hamm B, Ros PR, Eds. Abdominal Imaging. Berlin, Germany: Springer; c2013. Pp. 593\u2013602.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Haselkorn T, Whittemore AS, Lilienfeld DE. Incidence of small-bowel cancer in the United States and worldwide: Geographic, temporal, and racial differences. Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Sep;16(7):781\u20137.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Jasti R, Carucci LR. Small bowel neoplasms: A pictorial review. Radiographics. 2020 Jun;40(4):1020\u201338.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Minardi AJ Jr, Zibari GB, Aultman DF, McMillan RW, McDonald JC. Small-bowel tumors. Am Surg. 1998 Jun;64(6):544\u20138.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Buckley JA, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of small bowel neoplasms: Spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 1998 Mar-Apr;18(2):379\u201392.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Arber N, Neugut AI, Weinstein IB, Holt P. Molecular genetics of small bowel cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Sep;6(9):745\u20138.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gill SS, Heuman DM, Mihas AA. Small intestinal neoplasms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;33(4):267\u201382.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Schottenfeld D, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Vigneau FD. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of neoplasia in the small intestine. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):58\u201369.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Michel S, Kloor M, Singh S, Gdynia G, Roth W, von Knebel Doeberitz M, et al. Coding microsatellite instability analysis in microsatellite unstable small intestinal adenocarcinomas identifies MARCKS as a common target of inactivation. Mol Carcinog. 2010 Feb;49(2):175\u201382.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bergmann F, Singh S, Michel S, Kahlert C, Schirmacher P, Helmke B, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinomas in celiac disease follow the CIM-MSI pathway. Oncol Rep. 2010 Dec;24(6):1535\u20139.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Overman M, Pozadzides J, Kopetz S, Wen S, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA, et al. Immunophenotype and molecular characterisation of adenocarcinoma of the small intestine. Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan;102(1):144\u201350.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gore RM, Mehta UK, Berlin JW, Rao V, Newmark GM. Diagnosis and staging of small bowel tumors. Cancer Imaging. 2006 Dec;6(1):209\u201312.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Crusco F, Pugliese F, Maselli A, Pelliccia G, Mariani E, Farroni F, et al. Malignant small-bowel neoplasms: Spectrum of disease on MR imaging. Radiol Med. 2010 Dec;115(8):1279\u201391.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">North JH, Pack MS. Malignant tumors of the small intestine: A review of 144 cases. Am Surg. 2000 Jan;66(1):46\u201351.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bouvier AM, Robaszkiewicz M, Jooste V, Cariou M, Drouil lard A, Bouvier V, et al. Trends in incidence of small bowel cancer according to histology: A population-based study. French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM). J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;55(2):181-8.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Wongsiriamnuey T, Limsrivilai J. Current perspectives on small bowel tumors: Overview of prevalence, clinical manifestations, and treatment approaches. Siriraj Med J. 2024 Apr;76(4):225-33.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Shinya T. Malignant small bowel neoplasms: A review of post-contrast multiphasic multidetector computed tomography. J Med Invest. 2022 Apr;69(1):19\u201324.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Reynolds I, Healy P, McNamara DA. Malignant tumours of the small intestine. Surgeon. 2014 Oct;12(5):263\u201370.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chung CS, Tai CM, Huang TY, Chang CW, Chen KC, Tseng CM, et al. Small bowel tumors: A digestive endoscopy society of Taiwan (DEST) multicenter enteroscopy-based epidemiologic study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Aug;117(8):705\u201310.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Wang L, Zhang H, Wang D, Shen Q, Huang L, Liu T, et al. Intussusception secondary to small bowel tumours: A retrospective study of 31 cases. BMC Pediatr. 2024 Apr;24(1):227.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zhuge Y, Cheung MC, Yang R, Eldick D, Koniaris LG, Sola JE. Pediatric intestinal foregut and small bowel solid tumors: A review of 105 cases. J Surg Res. 2009 Sep;156(1):95\u2013102.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Achour J, Serraj I, Amrani L, Amrani N. Small bowel tumors: What is the contribution of video capsule endoscopy? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;36(3):222\u20136.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Abu-Hamda EM, Hattab EM, Lynch PM. Small bowel tumors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003 Oct;5(5):386\u201393.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zini C, Kirchin MA, Catalano C, Passariello R, et al. Malignant tumors of the small intestine: A review of histopathology, multidetector CT and MRI aspects. Br J Radiol. 2011 Aug;84(1004):677\u201390.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Baltes P, Kurniawan N, Keuchel M. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of small bowel tumors and polyps. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;17(1):24\u201330.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chaaya A, Heller SJ. Introduction to small bowel tumors. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;14(2):88\u201393.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cheung DY, Choi MG. Current advance in small bowel tumors. Clin Endosc. 2011;44(1):13\u201321.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cheung DY, Lee IS, Chang DK, Kim JO, Cheon JH, Jang BI, et al. Capsule endoscopy in small bowel tumors: A multicenter Korean study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun;25(6):1079\u201386.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cobrin GM, Pittman RH, Lewis BS. Increased diagnostic yield of small bowel tumors with capsule endoscopy. Cancer. 2006 Jul;107(1):22\u20137.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Colina A, Hwang H, Wang H, Katz MHG, Sun R, Lee JE. Natural history and prognostic factors for localised small bowel adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open [Internet]. 2020;5:e000960. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/33188051\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/33188051\/<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Egberts JH, Scharrer ML, Hinz S, Schafmayer C, Klomp HJ, Faendrich F, et al. Small bowel cancer: Single-centre results over a period of 12 years. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jan;54(73):129\u201334.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Fantasia S, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Kayali S, Koulaouzidis G, Pennazio M, Koulaouzidis A, et al. The role of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of small bowel tumors: A narrative review. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan;16(2):262.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gangi A, Siegel E, Barmparas G, Lo S, Jamil LH, Hendifar A, et al. Multifocality in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):303\u20139.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Green J, Schlieve CR, Friedrich AK, Baratta K, Ma DH, Min M, et al. Approach to the diagnostic workup and management of small bowel lesions at a tertiary care center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jun;22(6):1034\u201342.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hatzaras I, Palesty JA, Abir F, Sullivan P, Kozol RA, Dudrick SJ, et al. Small-bowel tumors: Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 1260 cases from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):229\u201335.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Honda W, Ohmiya N, Hirooka Y, Nakamura M, Miyahara R, Ohno E, et al. Enteroscopic and radiologic diagnoses, treatment, and prognoses of small-bowel tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):344\u201354.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hristova L, Plac\u00e9 V, Nemeth J, Boudiaf M, Laurent V, Soyer P. Small bowel tumors: Spectrum of findings on 64-section CT enteroclysis with pathologic correlation. Clin Imaging. 2012 Mar-Apr;36(2):104\u201312.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Imaoka H, Higaki N, Kumagi T, Miyaike J, Ohmoto M, Yamauchi K, et al. Characteristics of small bowel tumors detected by double balloon endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2366\u201371.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ito H, Perez A, Brooks DC, Osteen RT, Zinner MJ, Moore FD Jr, et al. Surgical treatment of small bowel cancer: A 20-year single institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Nov;7(7):925\u201330.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Jie Z, Tianle M, Bo S, Chenli Z. Utility of DBE for the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel polyps and tumors. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul;10(3):107\u201312.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kala Z, Kysela P, Meluz\u00ednov\u00e1 H. Small-bowel tumors in the elderly 65+ years: 10 years of experience. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 Oct;41(5):403\u20137.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kim JS, Park SH, Hansel S, Fletcher JG. Imaging and screening of cancer of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;55(6):1273\u201391.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kim SW, Kim HC, Oh J, Won KY, Park SJ, Yang DM. Tumors of the jejunum and ileum: A pattern-based imaging approach on CT. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jul;44(7):2337\u201345.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Korman MU. Radiologic evaluation and staging of small intestine neoplasms. Eur J Radiol. 2002 Jun;42(3):193\u2013205.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lee BI, Choi H, Choi KY, Byeon JS, Jang HJ, Eun CS, et al. Clinical characteristics of small bowel tumors diagnosed by double-balloon endoscopy: KASID multi-center study. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Oct;56(10):2920\u20137.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Liu FC, Wang CH, Chen PJ, Shih YL, Lin HH, Lin JC, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of small bowel tumors: A retrospective study. World J Clin Cases. 2024 Dec;12(34):6696\u2013704.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Minordi LM, Binda C, Scaldaferri F, Holleran G, Larosa L, Belmonte G, et al. Primary neoplasms of the small bowel at CT: A pictorial essay for the clinician. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Feb;22(3):598\u2013608.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mitsui K, Tanaka S, Yamamoto H, Kobayashi T, Ehara A, Yano T, et al. Role of double-balloon endoscopy in the diagnosis of small-bowel tumors: The first Japanese multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):498\u2013504.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Noujaima MG, Dorsey C, Parish A, Raines D, Boudreaux L, Hanscom M, et al. Clinical features and management of small bowel masses detected during device-assisted enteroscopy: A multi-center experience. Gastroenterology Res. 2022 Dec;15(6):353\u201363.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Paredes M\u00e9ndez JE, Fern\u00e1ndez Luque JL, Vargas Marcacuzco HT, Alosilla Sandoval PA, Gonzales Yovera JG, Arenas Gamio JL. Caracter\u00edsticas cl\u00ednico-patol\u00f3gicas y manejo de tumores primarios de intestino delgado de localizaci\u00f3n yeyuno-ileal. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2021 Dec;41(4):215\u201320.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Paski SC, Semrad CE. Small bowel tumors. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009 Jul;19(3):461\u201379.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Perez A, Saltzman JR, Carr-Locke DL, Brooks DC, Osteen RT, Zinner MJ, et al. Benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 May-Jun;7(4):536\u201341.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pourmand K, Itzkowitz SH. Small bowel neoplasms and polyps. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 May;18(5):23.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">de Latour RA, Kilaru SM, Gross SA. Management of small bowel polyps: A literature review. Best Pract Res Cl Ga. 2017 Aug;31(4):401\u20138.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rondonotti E, Pennazio M, Toth E, Menchen P, Riccioni ME, De Palma GD, et al. Small-bowel neoplasms in patients undergoing video capsule endoscopy: A multicenter European study. Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):488\u201395.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rosato FE Jr, Rosato EL. Current surgical management of intestinal metastases. Semin Oncol. 2008 Apr;35(2):177\u201382.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sailer J, Zacherl J, Schima W. MDCT of small bowel tumours. Cancer Imaging 2007 Dec;7(1):224\u201333.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00e1nchez-Ram\u00f3n A, Cerino-Palomino V, Medina-Franco H. Tumores de intestino delgado: Experiencia en el Instituto Nacional de Ciencias M\u00e9dicas y Nutrici\u00f3n \u201cSalvador Zubir\u00e1n\u201d. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2012 Oct-Dec;77(4):157\u2013230.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Schwartz GD, Barkin JS. Small bowel tumors. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2006 Apr;16(2):267\u201375.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Silva F, Bustamante M, Latorre G, Flandez J, Montero I, Dukes E, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of malignant small bowel tumors: Experience from a university hospital in Chile. Gastrohep. 2024 May;47(5):491\u20139.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tangkittikasem N, Boonyaarunnate T, Aswakul P, Kachintorn U, Prachayakul V. Clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic manifestations of small bowel malignancies: A first report from Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8613\u20138.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vlachou E, Koffas A, Toumpanakis C, Keuchel M. Updates in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun-Aug;64-65:101860. Available from: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S1521691823000409?via%3Dihub\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S1521691823000409?via%3Dihub<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yoo AY, Lee BJ, Kim WS, Kim SM, Kim SH, Joo MK, et al. Clinicopathological features of small bowel tumors diagnosed by video capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy: A single center experience. Clin Endosc. 2021 Jan;54(1):85\u201391.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yu IS, Al-Hashami Z, Chapani P, Speers C, Davies JM, Lim HJ, et al. Impact of tumor location on patient outcomes in small bowel cancers. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Jun;21(2):107\u201313.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Zhang S, Zheng C, Chen Y, Xu Q, Ma J, Yuan W, et al. Clinicopathologic features, surgical treatments, and outcomes of small bowel tumors: A retrospective study in China. Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:145\u201354.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Yamashita K, Oka S, Yamada T, Mitsui K, Yamamoto H, Takahashi K, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma: A large multicenter analysis of the JSCCR database in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):376\u201388.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Huang J, Chan SC, Fung YC, Mak FY, Lok V, NCD Global Health Research Group, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends of small intestinal cancer: A global analysis of cancer registries. Gastroenterology. 2023 Sep;165(3):600\u201312.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Larouche V, Akirov A, Alshehri S, Ezzat S. Management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Sep;11(9):1395.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">American Cancer Society [Internet]. Survival rates for small intestine cancer (adenocarcinoma) [cited 2025 February 20]. Available from: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancer.org\/cancer\/types\/small-intestine-cancer\/detection-diagnosis-staging\/survival-rates.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">www.cancer.org\/cancer\/types\/small-intestine-cancer\/detection-diagnosis-staging\/survival-rates.html<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Huang J, Chan SC, Fung YC, Mak FY, Lok V, NCD Global Health Research Group, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends of small intestinal cancer: A global analysis of cancer registries. Gastroenterology 2023;165:600\u201312.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Original Article Hell J Surg. 2025 Apr-Jun;95(5):55\u201367 doi: 10.59869\/25062 Panagiotis Theodoropoulos1, Georgios Floros1, Georgios Giannos1, Stavroula Papaeleftheriou1, Vasiliki Tseliou1, Konstantinos Bikas1, Dimitrios Matsagkos1, Athina Chrysikopoulou1, Ioannis Tsiampas1, Teresa Bidetti1, Aikaterini Starka1, Stavroula Katsimente1, Marietta Lavrentaki1, Georgios Taibiris1, Aggeliki Koltsida1, Nestoras Georgakakos1, Nikolaos Chatziathanasiou1, Achilleas Koulaksidis1, Evangelos Velaoras1, Panagiotis Psychas1, Filalithis Mamakis1, Konstantina Sitouni1, Nikolaos Kochilas1, <a href=\"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/?p=749\" class=\"read-more below\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[259],"tags":[262,263,261,260,73],"class_list":["post-749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-volume-95-2025-issue-2","tag-enterectomy","tag-histopathology","tag-neoplasm","tag-small-intestine","tag-tumour"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=749"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/749\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":888,"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/749\/revisions\/888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hjs.gr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}